Claude Code for Laravel: A Practitioner's Workflow
Master Claude Code for Laravel development. Battle-tested workflows for migrations, Eloquent debugging, testing, and API scaffolding. Boost productivity.
After 14 years of PHP and Laravel development, I have integrated Claude Code into my daily workflow for everything from rapid prototyping to maintaining complex enterprise applications. The combination of Laravel's opinionated conventions and Claude Code's code understanding capabilities creates a uniquely productive development experience---but only when you know how to leverage both effectively.
This guide shares the specific workflows I use for common Laravel development tasks: generating migrations, writing tests, debugging Eloquent queries, scaffolding APIs, and refactoring legacy code. These are not theoretical patterns but battle-tested approaches refined through real client projects.
For developers concerned about usage limits and token consumption while following these workflows, see my guide on Claude Code token management strategies to maximize productivity within subscription constraints.
Setting Up Claude Code for Laravel Projects
Before diving into workflows, proper setup makes everything that follows more effective. Laravel's recent AI tooling ecosystem provides excellent foundations.
Installing Laravel Boost
Laravel Boost is Laravel's official MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that transforms Claude Code from a general-purpose assistant into a Laravel expert that understands your specific application. Install it as a development dependency:
composer require laravel/boost --dev
php artisan boost:install
During installation, select Claude Code as your editor. Boost provides over 15 specialized tools including:
- Database schema inspection: Claude can query your actual table structures
- Route inspection: Understanding your application's routing with middleware
- Artisan command discovery: Knowledge of available commands
- Documentation search: 17,000+ pieces of indexed Laravel documentation
- Tinker integration: Execute PHP directly to test assumptions
Connecting Boost to Claude Code
After installation, add the MCP server to Claude Code:
claude mcp add laravel-boost -- php artisan boost:mcp
Verify the connection by asking Claude about your application:
What Laravel version is this project running? List the installed first-party packages.
Claude should respond with accurate information pulled directly from your application.
Creating an Effective CLAUDE.md
While Boost provides automatic context, a well-crafted CLAUDE.md file adds project-specific knowledge that no automated tool can infer. For Laravel projects, I use this structure:
# Project Context
## Application Overview
- **Framework**: Laravel 11.x with PHP 8.3
- **Frontend**: Livewire 3 with Tailwind CSS 4
- **Testing**: Pest PHP with parallel execution
- **Code Style**: Laravel Pint with preset laravel
## Conventions
- Use Form Requests for validation (not inline $request->validate())
- Repository pattern for complex data access, direct Eloquent for simple queries
- API resources for all JSON responses
- Feature tests for HTTP endpoints, unit tests for services
## Commands
```bash
php artisan test --parallel # Run full test suite
php artisan test --filter=ClassName # Run specific test
./vendor/bin/pint --dirty # Format changed files
php artisan migrate:fresh --seed # Reset database (dev only)
Do Not Modify
- app/Services/PaymentGateway.php (PCI audited)
- config/services.php credentials (use .env)
- database/migrations/ existing files (create new migrations)
Project-Specific Patterns
- Money stored as integers (cents), use Money value object
- Dates use Carbon, display in user's timezone from settings
- Soft deletes on all models with user data
Run `/init` to bootstrap an initial file, but always curate it manually. The auto-generated content is a starting point, not a final product. For comprehensive strategies on creating effective CLAUDE.md files, especially in complex scenarios, see my [SEO optimization case study](/blog/claude-code-seo-optimization-case-study) which demonstrates advanced agent configuration.
## Workflow: Generating Migrations and Models
Migration generation is where Claude Code saves the most time for routine work. The key is providing complete context upfront.
### The Complete Context Prompt
Instead of asking Claude to create a migration piecemeal, provide full business context:
Create a migration and model for a Project entity with these requirements:
- Projects belong to a User (creator) and a Team
- Projects have: name (required, max 255), description (nullable text), status (enum: draft, active, completed, archived), budget (money as cents), start_date and end_date (nullable dates)
- Projects can have many Tasks (future migration)
- Include soft deletes and timestamps
- Add appropriate indexes for common queries
Follow our project conventions in CLAUDE.md.
Claude generates the migration with proper foreign keys, indexes, and the enum handling Laravel expects:
```php
<?php
use Illuminate\Database\Migrations\Migration;
use Illuminate\Database\Schema\Blueprint;
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Schema;
return new class extends Migration
{
public function up(): void
{
Schema::create('projects', function (Blueprint $table) {
$table->id();
$table->foreignId('user_id')->constrained()->cascadeOnDelete();
$table->foreignId('team_id')->constrained()->cascadeOnDelete();
$table->string('name');
$table->text('description')->nullable();
$table->enum('status', ['draft', 'active', 'completed', 'archived'])
->default('draft');
$table->unsignedBigInteger('budget')->default(0);
$table->date('start_date')->nullable();
$table->date('end_date')->nullable();
$table->timestamps();
$table->softDeletes();
// Indexes for common query patterns
$table->index(['team_id', 'status']);
$table->index(['user_id', 'created_at']);
});
}
public function down(): void
{
Schema::dropIfExists('projects');
}
};
The Follow-Up Model Request
After the migration, request the complete model with relationships and casts:
Now create the Project model with:
- Proper relationships to User (creator), Team, and Tasks (hasMany)
- Casts for status enum, dates, and money fields
- Scopes for common filters (active, byTeam, overBudget)
- Follow our money convention (stored as cents, accessor returns dollars)
Claude generates a model aligned with your conventions:
<?php
namespace App\Models;
use App\Enums\ProjectStatus;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Builder;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Factories\HasFactory;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Relations\BelongsTo;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Relations\HasMany;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\SoftDeletes;
class Project extends Model
{
use HasFactory, SoftDeletes;
protected $fillable = [
'user_id',
'team_id',
'name',
'description',
'status',
'budget',
'start_date',
'end_date',
];
protected function casts(): array
{
return [
'status' => ProjectStatus::class,
'budget' => 'integer',
'start_date' => 'date',
'end_date' => 'date',
];
}
// Relationships
public function creator(): BelongsTo
{
return $this->belongsTo(User::class, 'user_id');
}
public function team(): BelongsTo
{
return $this->belongsTo(Team::class);
}
public function tasks(): HasMany
{
return $this->hasMany(Task::class);
}
// Accessors
public function getBudgetInDollarsAttribute(): float
{
return $this->budget / 100;
}
// Scopes
public function scopeActive(Builder $query): Builder
{
return $query->where('status', ProjectStatus::Active);
}
public function scopeByTeam(Builder $query, int $teamId): Builder
{
return $query->where('team_id', $teamId);
}
public function scopeOverBudget(Builder $query): Builder
{
return $query->whereHas('tasks', function ($q) {
$q->selectRaw('SUM(actual_cost) as total_cost')
->havingRaw('total_cost > projects.budget');
});
}
}
When to Verify Manually
Always verify:
- Foreign key constraints: Claude sometimes suggests cascade behaviors that do not match your data integrity requirements
- Index placement: Composite indexes should match your actual query patterns
- Enum values: Ensure the enum definition matches existing application constants
- Money handling: Verify the conversion logic matches your precision requirements
Run the migration on a test database before committing:
php artisan migrate:fresh --seed --env=testing
Workflow: Writing Feature and Unit Tests
Testing is where Claude Code's ability to understand existing code patterns shines. The workflow differs for new features versus existing code.
Testing New Features
When you have just created a feature, ask Claude to generate comprehensive tests:
Write Pest feature tests for the ProjectController covering:
- Index: listing projects filtered by team, pagination
- Store: validation, authorization (user must belong to team)
- Show: authorization, 404 handling
- Update: partial updates, status transitions
- Delete: soft delete, authorization
Use our project's testing conventions. Check tests/ directory for examples.
Claude reads your existing test patterns and generates consistent tests:
<?php
use App\Models\Project;
use App\Models\Team;
use App\Models\User;
use App\Enums\ProjectStatus;
beforeEach(function () {
$this->team = Team::factory()->create();
$this->user = User::factory()->create();
$this->user->teams()->attach($this->team);
});
describe('Project Index', function () {
it('lists projects for the authenticated user team', function () {
$projects = Project::factory()
->count(3)
->for($this->team)
->for($this->user, 'creator')
->create();
// Create project for different team (should not appear)
Project::factory()->create();
$response = $this->actingAs($this->user)
->getJson("/api/teams/{$this->team->id}/projects");
$response
->assertOk()
->assertJsonCount(3, 'data')
->assertJsonStructure([
'data' => [
'*' => ['id', 'name', 'status', 'budget', 'created_at'],
],
'meta' => ['current_page', 'total'],
]);
});
it('filters projects by status', function () {
Project::factory()
->for($this->team)
->for($this->user, 'creator')
->create(['status' => ProjectStatus::Active]);
Project::factory()
->for($this->team)
->for($this->user, 'creator')
->create(['status' => ProjectStatus::Draft]);
$response = $this->actingAs($this->user)
->getJson("/api/teams/{$this->team->id}/projects?status=active");
$response
->assertOk()
->assertJsonCount(1, 'data');
});
});
describe('Project Store', function () {
it('creates a project with valid data', function () {
$projectData = [
'name' => 'New Project',
'description' => 'Project description',
'status' => 'draft',
'budget' => 10000, // $100.00
'start_date' => now()->addDay()->format('Y-m-d'),
];
$response = $this->actingAs($this->user)
->postJson("/api/teams/{$this->team->id}/projects", $projectData);
$response
->assertCreated()
->assertJsonPath('data.name', 'New Project')
->assertJsonPath('data.status', 'draft');
$this->assertDatabaseHas('projects', [
'team_id' => $this->team->id,
'user_id' => $this->user->id,
'name' => 'New Project',
]);
});
it('validates required fields', function () {
$response = $this->actingAs($this->user)
->postJson("/api/teams/{$this->team->id}/projects", []);
$response
->assertUnprocessable()
->assertJsonValidationErrors(['name']);
});
it('prevents non-team-members from creating projects', function () {
$outsider = User::factory()->create();
$response = $this->actingAs($outsider)
->postJson("/api/teams/{$this->team->id}/projects", [
'name' => 'Unauthorized Project',
]);
$response->assertForbidden();
});
});
describe('Project Update', function () {
it('updates project with partial data', function () {
$project = Project::factory()
->for($this->team)
->for($this->user, 'creator')
->create(['name' => 'Original Name']);
$response = $this->actingAs($this->user)
->patchJson("/api/projects/{$project->id}", [
'name' => 'Updated Name',
]);
$response
->assertOk()
->assertJsonPath('data.name', 'Updated Name');
});
it('validates status transitions', function () {
$project = Project::factory()
->for($this->team)
->for($this->user, 'creator')
->create(['status' => ProjectStatus::Completed]);
// Cannot transition from completed back to draft
$response = $this->actingAs($this->user)
->patchJson("/api/projects/{$project->id}", [
'status' => 'draft',
]);
$response->assertUnprocessable();
});
});
describe('Project Delete', function () {
it('soft deletes the project', function () {
$project = Project::factory()
->for($this->team)
->for($this->user, 'creator')
->create();
$response = $this->actingAs($this->user)
->deleteJson("/api/projects/{$project->id}");
$response->assertNoContent();
$this->assertSoftDeleted('projects', ['id' => $project->id]);
});
});
Characterization Tests for Existing Code
When working with existing code that lacks tests, ask Claude to generate characterization tests that document current behavior:
Read app/Services/InvoiceCalculator.php and generate characterization tests.
Focus on documenting current behavior, not what it should do.
Use the test fixtures in tests/fixtures/invoices.json if available.
This approach creates a safety net before refactoring. For comprehensive guidance on working with legacy Laravel codebases, including detailed characterization testing workflows, see my legacy codebase practitioner's guide.
Testing Complex Scenarios
For complex business logic, describe the scenario in detail:
Write a test for the invoice payment workflow:
1. User creates invoice for client
2. Invoice is sent (status changes, email triggered)
3. Client pays partial amount
4. Invoice status becomes 'partial'
5. Client pays remaining amount
6. Invoice status becomes 'paid', payment_completed_at is set
Mock the email sending. Test the complete flow and intermediate states.
Claude generates tests that cover the entire workflow while properly isolating external dependencies.
Workflow: Debugging Complex Eloquent Queries
Eloquent query debugging is one of Claude Code's strongest capabilities, especially when combined with Laravel Boost's database introspection.
The Debugging Prompt Pattern
When a query returns unexpected results, provide full context:
This query should return active projects with their task counts,
filtered to the current team, but it is returning projects from all teams:
```php
$projects = Project::query()
->withCount('tasks')
->where('status', 'active')
->whereHas('team.users', fn($q) => $q->where('id', auth()->id()))
->paginate();
Our team relationship: User belongsToMany Teams, Project belongsTo Team. What is wrong with this query?
Claude analyzes the relationship chain and identifies issues:
The issue is in your whereHas clause. You're checking if the project's team has the authenticated user, but you're not filtering to a specific team.
The query currently returns: "All active projects where the project's team contains the authenticated user" - which is ALL teams the user belongs to.
If you want projects from a SPECIFIC team, use:
$projects = Project::query()
->withCount('tasks')
->where('status', 'active')
->where('team_id', $currentTeamId)
->paginate();
Or if you want projects from all teams the user belongs to (which your current query should do), the whereHas looks correct. Check that:
- The 'status' column contains 'active' (not an enum mismatch)
- The team_users pivot table has the correct relationships
- You're not caching the query results
To debug, add ->toSql() and ->getBindings() to see the generated SQL.
### N+1 Query Detection
Ask Claude to analyze controller methods for N+1 issues:
Analyze the ProjectController@index method for N+1 query problems. Check what relationships are accessed in the view/resource and whether they're being eager loaded.
Claude reads the controller, the resource class, and identifies missing eager loads:
Found N+1 issues in ProjectController@index:
- ProjectResource accesses $project->creator->name but creator isn't loaded
- ProjectResource accesses $project->tasks->count() - should use withCount
- The team relationship is loaded but team.subscription is accessed in the authorization check without eager loading
Optimized query:
$projects = Project::query()
->with(['creator:id,name', 'team.subscription'])
->withCount('tasks')
->where('team_id', $teamId)
->latest()
->paginate(25);
This reduces queries from ~52 (25 projects * 2 relationships + base) to 4.
### Query Performance Analysis
For slow queries, ask Claude to suggest optimizations:
This query takes 3+ seconds on 50k projects:
$overdueProjects = Project::query()
->where('status', 'active')
->where('end_date', '<', now())
->whereDoesntHave('invoices', fn($q) => $q->where('status', 'paid'))
->get();
Our indexes: projects(status), projects(end_date), invoices(project_id, status). How can we optimize this?
Claude suggests specific optimizations:
The whereDoesntHave is causing a correlated subquery for each row. Consider these optimizations:
- Add composite index (most impactful):
$table->index(['status', 'end_date']);
- Rewrite with LEFT JOIN (avoids correlated subquery):
$overdueProjects = Project::query()
->leftJoin('invoices', function ($join) {
$join->on('projects.id', '=', 'invoices.project_id')
->where('invoices.status', '=', 'paid');
})
->whereNull('invoices.id')
->where('projects.status', 'active')
->where('projects.end_date', '<', now())
->select('projects.*')
->get();
- Use chunk for large datasets:
Project::query()
->where('status', 'active')
->where('end_date', '<', now())
->whereDoesntHave('invoices', fn($q) => $q->where('status', 'paid'))
->chunk(1000, function ($projects) {
// Process batch
});
For the best results, add the composite index and consider whether you can cache this query result (it only needs to update daily).
## Workflow: Scaffolding API Endpoints
API scaffolding is where Claude Code accelerates development most dramatically. The key is providing complete specifications upfront.
### The Complete API Specification Prompt
Create a complete API resource for Projects with these requirements:
Routes:
- GET /api/v1/teams/{team}/projects (index, paginated)
- POST /api/v1/teams/{team}/projects (store)
- GET /api/v1/projects/{project} (show)
- PATCH /api/v1/projects/{project} (update)
- DELETE /api/v1/projects/{project} (destroy)
Authorization:
- Users can only access projects in teams they belong to
- Only team admins can delete projects
- Project creator or team admin can update
Validation:
- name: required, max 255
- description: nullable, max 5000
- status: enum (draft, active, completed, archived)
- budget: integer (cents), min 0
- start_date/end_date: dates, end must be after start
Generate: routes, controller, form requests, resource, policy. Follow our API conventions from CLAUDE.md.
Claude generates all components following your conventions. Here is the controller as an example:
```php
<?php
namespace App\Http\Controllers\Api\V1;
use App\Http\Controllers\Controller;
use App\Http\Requests\StoreProjectRequest;
use App\Http\Requests\UpdateProjectRequest;
use App\Http\Resources\ProjectResource;
use App\Http\Resources\ProjectCollection;
use App\Models\Project;
use App\Models\Team;
use Illuminate\Http\JsonResponse;
use Illuminate\Http\Response;
class ProjectController extends Controller
{
public function __construct()
{
$this->authorizeResource(Project::class, 'project');
}
/**
* List projects for a team
*/
public function index(Team $team): ProjectCollection
{
$this->authorize('viewAny', [Project::class, $team]);
$projects = $team->projects()
->with(['creator:id,name'])
->withCount('tasks')
->when(request('status'), fn($q, $status) => $q->where('status', $status))
->latest()
->paginate(request('per_page', 25));
return new ProjectCollection($projects);
}
/**
* Create a new project
*/
public function store(StoreProjectRequest $request, Team $team): JsonResponse
{
$project = $team->projects()->create([
...$request->validated(),
'user_id' => $request->user()->id,
]);
return (new ProjectResource($project->load('creator')))
->response()
->setStatusCode(Response::HTTP_CREATED);
}
/**
* Display a project
*/
public function show(Project $project): ProjectResource
{
return new ProjectResource(
$project->load(['creator:id,name', 'team:id,name', 'tasks'])
);
}
/**
* Update a project
*/
public function update(UpdateProjectRequest $request, Project $project): ProjectResource
{
$project->update($request->validated());
return new ProjectResource($project->fresh(['creator', 'team']));
}
/**
* Delete a project
*/
public function destroy(Project $project): Response
{
$project->delete();
return response()->noContent();
}
}
Incremental Endpoint Addition
When adding endpoints to existing resources, provide context about what exists:
Add these endpoints to the existing ProjectController:
POST /api/v1/projects/{project}/archive (change status to archived)
POST /api/v1/projects/{project}/duplicate (clone project with tasks)
The controller already has standard CRUD. Add these as additional actions.
Archive should validate the current status allows archiving.
Duplicate should copy all project data and tasks, resetting statuses to draft.
Claude generates only the new methods, maintaining consistency with existing code.
API Documentation Generation
After creating endpoints, ask Claude to generate API documentation:
Generate OpenAPI/Scribe annotations for the ProjectController methods.
Include example requests and responses based on the actual validation rules
and resource structure.
This creates documentation that stays synchronized with your actual implementation.
Workflow: Refactoring Legacy Laravel Code
Refactoring legacy code requires the most careful approach. I have written extensively about this in my guide to Claude Code for legacy codebases, but here are Laravel-specific patterns.
The Safe Refactoring Sequence
Always follow this sequence:
1. First, read app/Services/LegacyReportGenerator.php and explain what it does.
Do not suggest any changes yet.
2. Now identify the responsibilities this class has. List them.
3. Generate characterization tests that document current behavior.
Use existing test data if available.
4. After I verify the tests pass, suggest a refactoring plan.
Keep changes incremental and reversible.
This sequence prevents Claude from making changes it cannot verify and creates safety nets at each step.
Controller to Service Extraction
A common legacy pattern is fat controllers. Ask Claude to extract service classes:
The InvoiceController@store method has 150 lines handling:
- Validation
- Invoice creation
- Line item calculations
- Tax calculations
- PDF generation
- Email sending
- Audit logging
Extract the business logic into appropriate service classes while keeping
the controller as a thin HTTP layer. Maintain backward compatibility
with existing tests.
Claude proposes a structure and generates incremental changes:
I'll extract this into focused services:
1. InvoiceCalculationService - line items, taxes, totals
2. InvoiceDocumentService - PDF generation
3. InvoiceNotificationService - email sending
4. AuditService - logging (may already exist?)
Let me generate these one at a time. After each, we'll verify tests pass
before proceeding.
Starting with InvoiceCalculationService...
Upgrading Laravel Versions
When upgrading Laravel versions, Claude can identify required changes:
We're upgrading from Laravel 9 to Laravel 11. Read the following files and
identify required changes:
- app/Http/Kernel.php
- app/Providers/RouteServiceProvider.php
- config/app.php
- All files in app/Rules/
Focus on breaking changes and deprecations. Do not make changes yet.
Claude audits the files and provides a migration checklist specific to your codebase.
Best Practices for Prompting Claude Code in Laravel
Be Specific About Laravel Conventions
Generic prompts produce generic code. Laravel-specific prompts produce idiomatic Laravel:
// Generic (produces inconsistent results)
"Create a class to handle user registration"
// Laravel-specific (produces idiomatic code)
"Create a Laravel Form Request for user registration with validation rules.
Use Laravel 11 conventions: invokable rules, typed properties, authorize method."
Reference Existing Code
Always point Claude to existing patterns:
"Create a new ProjectPolicy following the pattern in app/Policies/InvoicePolicy.php.
Use the same authorization checks and team membership verification."
Specify Error Handling Expectations
Laravel has specific error handling patterns:
"Handle validation failures with Laravel's ValidationException.
Use abort_if/abort_unless for authorization.
Throw custom exceptions for business rule violations that should return 422."
Request Code Reviews
After generating code, ask Claude to review it:
"Review the ProjectController I just created. Check for:
- N+1 query issues
- Missing authorization checks
- Validation gaps
- PSR-12 compliance
- Laravel best practices"
When to Trust the AI vs When to Verify Manually
After extensive use, I have developed clear guidelines for when Claude Code output can be trusted and when it requires careful verification.
Trust Claude For
- Boilerplate generation: Migrations, models, resources, form requests
- Test structure: Setting up test classes, arrange/act/assert patterns
- Code explanations: Understanding existing code, documenting logic
- Syntax and Laravel API usage: It knows Laravel's API thoroughly
- Refactoring patterns: Extracting methods, organizing code
Always Verify
- Authorization logic: Claude may miss edge cases in permission checks
- Financial calculations: Any money handling needs manual verification
- Data integrity constraints: Foreign keys, cascades, unique constraints
- Security-sensitive code: Authentication, encryption, sensitive data handling
- Complex query correctness: Run queries against real data to verify results
- Business rule implementation: Claude does not know your domain
Red Flags to Watch For
- Claude suggests removing code without understanding why it exists
- Generated tests only cover happy paths
- Overly complex solutions for simple problems
- Suggestions to upgrade dependencies without migration path
- Catch-all exception handling that hides errors
Key Takeaways
Claude Code transforms Laravel development when used with intentional workflows:
- Set up Laravel Boost for deep application context that goes beyond static analysis
- Craft a project-specific CLAUDE.md that documents your conventions, constraints, and patterns
- Provide complete context in prompts---business requirements, existing patterns, constraints
- Generate tests alongside features to create safety nets for future changes
- Use Claude for query debugging by providing full relationship context
- Follow the safe refactoring sequence: understand, test, then modify
- Trust but verify: Claude excels at boilerplate but needs human oversight for business logic
The developers getting the most from Claude Code in Laravel projects treat it as a highly capable pair programmer who knows Laravel deeply but needs explicit context about your specific application. Provide that context consistently, and Claude becomes a force multiplier for your Laravel development.
Related Reading:
- Claude Code for Legacy Codebases: A Practitioner's Complete Guide
- Laravel API Development Best Practices: A Complete Guide
- Migrating Legacy Laravel Apps: Lessons from 14 Years of PHP Development
External Resources:
- Laravel AI Assisted Development - Official Laravel Documentation
- Laravel Boost Documentation - GitHub Repository
- Claude Code Best Practices - Anthropic Engineering
- 10 Claude Code Tips for Laravel Developers - Jonathon Ringeisen

Richard Joseph Porter
Full-stack developer with expertise in modern web technologies. Passionate about building scalable applications and sharing knowledge through technical writing.
Need Help Upgrading Your Laravel App?
I specialize in modernizing legacy Laravel applications with zero downtime. Get a free codebase audit and upgrade roadmap.
Related Articles
AI-Assisted Code Review: Claude for Laravel Quality
Use Claude for Laravel code reviews. Catch security flaws, N+1 queries, and anti-patterns with proven prompts and CI/CD integration. Boost code quality.
Claude Code for Legacy Codebases: A Guide
Master CLAUDE.md configuration, context management, and incremental workflows to transform legacy modernization with Claude Code. Battle-tested strategies from real-world projects.
Integrating AI APIs in Laravel: OpenAI, Claude, Bedrock
Build AI features in Laravel with OpenAI, Claude, and AWS Bedrock. Complete guide covering content summarization, caching, and cost optimization.